Indigenous blood and ethical regimes in the United States and Australia since the 1960s

by Joanna Radin and Emma Kowal

Read Article

By Joanna Radin and Emma KowalFull Article: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/amet.12168/full


(image:
http://americanethnologist.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/10/ae-kowal-450px-224x300.jpg alt: Box labeled 'Master Workbooks Index, Vol. 1' on Professor Simon Easteal’s desk at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, May 30, 2011. Credit: Emma Kowal.

Box labeled 'Master Workbooks Index, Vol. 1' on Professor Simon Easteal’s desk at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, May 30, 2011. Credit: Emma Kowal.

) Box labeled “Master Workbooks Index, Vol. 1” on Professor Simon Easteal’s desk at the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, May 30, 2011. Credit: Emma Kowal.Blood samples collected from members of indigenous communities in the mid-20th century by scientists interested in human variation remain frozen today in institutional repositories around the world. This article focuses on two such collections—one established and maintained in the United States and the other in Australia. Through historical and ethnographic analysis, we show how scientific knowledge about the human species and ethical knowledge about human experimentation are coproduced differently in each national context over time. Through a series of vignettes, we trace the attempts of scientists and indigenous people to assemble and reassemble blood samples, ethical regimes, human biological knowledge, and personhood. In including ourselves—a U.S. historian of science and an Australian anthropologist—in the narrative, we show how humanistic and social scientific analysis contributes to ongoing efforts to maintain indigenous samples.